ACP Admin vs juntagrico
Both are self-hosted community-supported agriculture (csa) projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| ACP Admin | juntagrico | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 59/100 | 50/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 1166 | 267 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 329 | 31 |
| Stars | 80 | 55 |
| Latest release | none tagged | 19 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Built with | Ruby | Python |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
ACP Admin
CSA administration. Manage members, subscriptions, deliveries, drop-off locations, member participation, invoices and emails (documentation in French).
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 82% of tracked projects; popularity more than 6%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
juntagrico
Management platform for community gardens and vegetable cooperatives.
Activity has dropped noticeably. Check the repository before committing to it.
Commit activity more than 50% of tracked projects; popularity more than 4%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted community-supported agriculture (csa).