Beets vs Navidrome Music Server
Both are self-hosted media streaming - audio streaming projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Beets | Navidrome Music Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 86/100 | 84/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 2239 | 715 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 747 | 229 |
| Stars | 16k | 24k |
| Latest release | 17 Sept 2026 | 24 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Built with | Python, deb | Docker, Go |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Beets
Music library manager and MusicBrainz tagger (command-line and Web interface).
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 91% of tracked projects; popularity more than 85%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
Navidrome Music Server
Modern Music Server and Streamer, compatible with Subsonic/Airsonic.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 73% of tracked projects; popularity more than 90%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted media streaming - audio streaming.