Bencher vs Request Inbox
Both are self-hosted software development - testing projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Bencher | Request Inbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 71/100 | 24/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 606 | 27 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 147 | 10 |
| Stars | 909 | 6 |
| Latest release | 18 Jul 2026 | 11 Oct 2025 |
| Licence | MIT, Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Built with | Rust | Docker |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bencher
Suite of continuous benchmarking tools designed to catch performance regressions in CI.
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 68% of tracked projects; popularity more than 33%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
Request Inbox
Collect and inspect HTTP requests for testing and debugging. Create and manage inboxes, capture detailed request data, configure custom responses.
Little to no recent activity. Treat as unmaintained until proven otherwise.
Commit activity more than 13% of tracked projects; popularity in the bottom 1%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted software development - testing.