bittorrent-tracker vs Webtor

Both are self-hosted file transfer - peer-to-peer filesharing projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.

Webtor scores 57 against bittorrent-tracker's 50, putting it slightly ahead on the strength of a higher commit volume. That measures project health, not feature fit — bittorrent-tracker may still be the right choice if it does what you need.

	bittorrent-tracker	Webtor
Health score	50/100	57/100
Commits (11 mo)	19	123
Commits (last 3 mo)	11	116
Stars	1.9k	689
Latest release	25 May 2026	18 Sept 2026
Licence	MIT	MIT
Built with	Nodejs	Docker
Typical RAM	1 GB	1 GB

bittorrent-tracker

Simple, robust, BitTorrent tracker (client and server) implementation.

50/100

Slowing

Activity has dropped noticeably. Check the repository before committing to it.

Maintenance 4/40

Releases 21/25

Community 10/20

Momentum 15/15

Commit activity more than 10% of tracked projects; popularity more than 48%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

Webtor

Web-based torrent client with instant audio/video streaming.

57/100

Steady

Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.

Maintenance 14/40

Releases 25/25

Community 6/20

Momentum 13/15

Commit activity more than 34% of tracked projects; popularity more than 29%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

How to read this

Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.

What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.

See every option in this category: self-hosted file transfer - peer-to-peer filesharing.