BunkerWeb vs go-doxy
Both are self-hosted web servers projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| BunkerWeb | go-doxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 84/100 | 84/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 1915 | 887 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 494 | 179 |
| Stars | 11k | 4.2k |
| Latest release | 25 Sept 2026 | 19 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Built with | deb, Docker, K8S, Python | Docker, Go |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
BunkerWeb
Next-gen Web Application Firewall (WAF) that will protect your web services.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 88% of tracked projects; popularity more than 80%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
go-doxy
Lightweight, simple, and performant reverse proxy with WebUI, Docker integration, automatic shutdown/startup for container based on traffic.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 78% of tracked projects; popularity more than 63%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted web servers.