Chamilo LMS vs OpenOLAT
Both are self-hosted learning and courses projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Chamilo LMS | OpenOLAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 83/100 | 67/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 5239 | 3116 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 1712 | 980 |
| Stars | 1k | 444 |
| Latest release | 19 Sept 2026 | none tagged |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Built with | PHP | Java |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Chamilo LMS
Create a virtual campus for the provision of online or semi-online training.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 97% of tracked projects; popularity more than 35%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
OpenOLAT
Learning management system for teaching, education, assessment and communication.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 94% of tracked projects; popularity more than 22%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted learning and courses.