Chhoto URL vs snowshare
Both are self-hosted url shorteners projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Chhoto URL | snowshare | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 68/100 | 57/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 292 | 235 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 163 | 114 |
| Stars | 976 | 87 |
| Latest release | 23 Sept 2026 | 25 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | CC0-1.0 |
| Built with | Rust, Docker | Nodejs, Docker |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Chhoto URL
Simple, lightning-fast URL shortener with no bloat (fork of simply-shorten).
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 52% of tracked projects; popularity more than 35%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
snowshare
File and link sharing platform with URL shortening, code snippet sharing, and file uploads, featuring customizable expiration, privacy settings, and QR codes.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 47% of tracked projects; popularity more than 7%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted url shorteners.