Composio vs Svix

Both are self-hosted software development - api management projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.

Composio scores 90 against Svix's 81, putting it slightly ahead on the strength of a higher commit volume and a larger community. That measures project health, not feature fit — Svix may still be the right choice if it does what you need.

	Composio	Svix
Health score	90/100	81/100
Commits (11 mo)	4045	678
Commits (last 3 mo)	903	340
Stars	30k	3.4k
Latest release	24 Sept 2026	11 Sept 2026
Licence	Elastic-2.0	MIT
Built with	Python	Docker, Rust
Typical RAM	2 GB	1 GB

Composio

Integration platform for AI agents & LLMs with support for 250+ apps and custom tools.

90/100

Thriving

High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.

Maintenance 38/40

Releases 25/25

Community 18/20

Momentum 8/15

Commit activity more than 96% of tracked projects; popularity more than 92%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

Svix

Webhooks as a service that makes it super easy for API providers to send webhooks.

81/100

Healthy

Actively maintained with regular releases.

Maintenance 29/40

Releases 25/25

Community 12/20

Momentum 15/15

Commit activity more than 72% of tracked projects; popularity more than 60%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

How to read this

Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.

What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.

See every option in this category: self-hosted software development - api management.