Featbit vs Flipt

Both are self-hosted software development - feature toggle projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.

Flipt scores 79 against Featbit's 64, putting it ahead on the strength of a higher commit volume. That measures project health, not feature fit — Featbit may still be the right choice if it does what you need.

	Featbit	Flipt
Health score	64/100	79/100
Commits (11 mo)	130	671
Commits (last 3 mo)	46	193
Stars	1.9k	4.9k
Latest release	25 Sept 2026	20 Sept 2026
Licence	MIT	GPL-3.0
Built with	Docker, K8S	Docker, K8S, Go
Typical RAM	1 GB	1 GB

Featbit

Enterprise-grade feature flag platform that you can self-host.

64/100

Steady

Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.

Maintenance 14/40

Releases 25/25

Community 10/20

Momentum 15/15

Commit activity more than 35% of tracked projects; popularity more than 48%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

Flipt

Feature flag solution with support for multiple data backends (alternative to LaunchDarkly).

79/100

Healthy

Actively maintained with regular releases.

Maintenance 29/40

Releases 25/25

Community 13/20

Momentum 12/15

Commit activity more than 71% of tracked projects; popularity more than 66%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

How to read this

Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.

What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.

See every option in this category: self-hosted software development - feature toggle.