Featbit vs GO Feature Flag
Both are self-hosted software development - feature toggle projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Featbit | GO Feature Flag | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 64/100 | 82/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 130 | 1724 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 46 | 496 |
| Stars | 1.9k | 2.1k |
| Latest release | 25 Sept 2026 | 8 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Built with | Docker, K8S | Go |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Featbit
Enterprise-grade feature flag platform that you can self-host.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 35% of tracked projects; popularity more than 48%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
GO Feature Flag
Simple, complete, and lightweight feature flag solution (alternative to LaunchDarkly).
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 88% of tracked projects; popularity more than 50%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted software development - feature toggle.