Firefox Account Server vs Karakeep
Both are self-hosted bookmarks and link sharing projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Firefox Account Server | Karakeep | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 76/100 | 82/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 2700 | 816 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 861 | 172 |
| Stars | 686 | 29k |
| Latest release | 8 Jul 2026 | 11 Aug 2026 |
| Licence | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Built with | Nodejs, Java | Docker |
| Typical RAM | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Firefox Account Server
Host your own Firefox accounts server.
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 93% of tracked projects; popularity more than 29%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
Karakeep
Bookmark-everything app with a touch of AI for the data hoarders out there.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 76% of tracked projects; popularity more than 92%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted bookmarks and link sharing.