FitTrackee vs Statistics for Strava
Both are self-hosted health and fitness projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| FitTrackee | Statistics for Strava | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 66/100 | 58/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 1156 | 1076 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 69 | 1 |
| Stars | 1.2k | 9 |
| Latest release | 9 Sept 2026 | 19 Jul 2026 |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Built with | Python, Docker | Docker |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
FitTrackee
Simple workout/activity tracker.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 82% of tracked projects; popularity more than 37%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
Statistics for Strava
Statistics dashboard generated from Strava data.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 80% of tracked projects; popularity in the bottom 1%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted health and fitness.