Glance vs Heimdall
Both are self-hosted personal dashboards projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Glance | Heimdall | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 65/100 | 65/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 34 | 72 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 25 | 65 |
| Stars | 37k | 9.3k |
| Latest release | 3 Sept 2026 | 5 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Built with | Docker, Go | PHP |
| Typical RAM | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Glance
Highly customizable dashboard that puts all your feeds in one place.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 15% of tracked projects; popularity more than 94%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
Heimdall
Elegant solution to organise all your web applications.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 24% of tracked projects; popularity more than 78%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted personal dashboards.