LinkAce vs LinkWarden
Both are self-hosted bookmarks and link sharing projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| LinkAce | LinkWarden | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 65/100 | 84/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 166 | 558 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 71 | 266 |
| Stars | 3.3k | 20k |
| Latest release | 3 Aug 2026 | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Built with | Docker, PHP | Docker, Nodejs |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
LinkAce
Bookmark archive with automatic backups to the Internet Archive, link monitoring, and a full REST API. Installation is done via Docker, or as a simple PHP application.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 39% of tracked projects; popularity more than 59%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
LinkWarden
Bookmark and archive manager to store your useful links.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 67% of tracked projects; popularity more than 88%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted bookmarks and link sharing.