MeTube vs Seerr
Both are self-hosted media management projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| MeTube | Seerr | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 77/100 | 73/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 283 | 389 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 115 | 92 |
| Stars | 15k | 13k |
| Latest release | 27 Sept 2026 | 28 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Built with | Python, Nodejs, Docker | Docker, Nodejs |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
MeTube
Web GUI for youtube-dl, with playlist support. Allows downloading videos from dozens of websites.
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 51% of tracked projects; popularity more than 84%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
Seerr
Manage requests for your media library, supports Plex, Jellyfin and Emby media servers (fork of Overseerr).
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 58% of tracked projects; popularity more than 82%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted media management.