Numa vs Technitium DNS Server
Both are self-hosted dns projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Numa | Technitium DNS Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 60/100 | 76/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 123 | 616 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 123 | 172 |
| Stars | 1.5k | 10k |
| Latest release | 15 Sept 2026 | 26 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Built with | Rust, Docker, Nix | Docker, C# |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Numa
Ad-blocking DNS resolver with DNSSEC-validating recursive resolution, DoH/DoT/Oblivious DoH, ephemeral overrides, and local service domains, in a single Rust binary (alternative to Pi-hole, AdGuard Home, NextDNS).
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 34% of tracked projects; popularity more than 42%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
Technitium DNS Server
Authoritative/recursive DNS server with ad blocking functionality.
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 69% of tracked projects; popularity more than 79%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted dns.