OpenRouteService vs OpenTripPlanner
Both are self-hosted maps and global positioning system (gps) projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| OpenRouteService | OpenTripPlanner | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 75/100 | 83/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 508 | 4540 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 163 | 1168 |
| Stars | 2k | 2.7k |
| Latest release | 24 Sept 2026 | 9 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Built with | Docker, Java | Java, Javascript |
| Typical RAM | 2 GB | 2 GB |
OpenRouteService
Route service with directions, isochrones, time-distance matrix, route optimization, etc.
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 64% of tracked projects; popularity more than 49%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
OpenTripPlanner
Multimodal trip planning software based on OpenStreetMap data and consuming published GTFS-formatted data to suggest routes using local public transit systems.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 96% of tracked projects; popularity more than 56%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted maps and global positioning system (gps).