Reaparr vs tubesync
Both are self-hosted media management projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Reaparr | tubesync | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 75/100 | 78/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 2168 | 571 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 539 | 211 |
| Stars | 699 | 2.8k |
| Latest release | 21 Sept 2026 | 4 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Built with | Docker | Docker, Python |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Reaparr
Cross-platform Plex media downloader that seamlessly adds media from other Plex servers to your own.
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 90% of tracked projects; popularity more than 29%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
tubesync
Syncs YouTube channels and playlists to a locally hosted media server.
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 67% of tracked projects; popularity more than 56%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted media management.