Request Inbox vs WebHook Tester
Both are self-hosted software development - testing projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Request Inbox | WebHook Tester | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 24/100 | 28/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 27 | 47 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 10 | 0 |
| Stars | 6 | 541 |
| Latest release | 11 Oct 2025 | 13 Apr 2026 |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Built with | Docker | Docker, Go, deb, K8S |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Request Inbox
Collect and inspect HTTP requests for testing and debugging. Create and manage inboxes, capture detailed request data, configure custom responses.
Little to no recent activity. Treat as unmaintained until proven otherwise.
Commit activity more than 13% of tracked projects; popularity in the bottom 1%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
WebHook Tester
Powerful tool for testing WebHooks and more.
Little to no recent activity. Treat as unmaintained until proven otherwise.
Commit activity more than 18% of tracked projects; popularity more than 24%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted software development - testing.