Seerr vs tubesync

Both are self-hosted media management projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.

tubesync scores 78 against Seerr's 73, putting it slightly ahead on the strength of a stronger recent trend. That measures project health, not feature fit — Seerr may still be the right choice if it does what you need.

	Seerr	tubesync
Health score	73/100	78/100
Commits (11 mo)	389	571
Commits (last 3 mo)	92	211
Stars	13k	2.8k
Latest release	28 Sept 2026	4 Sept 2026
Licence	MIT	AGPL-3.0
Built with	Docker, Nodejs	Docker, Python
Typical RAM	1 GB	1 GB

Seerr

Manage requests for your media library, supports Plex, Jellyfin and Emby media servers (fork of Overseerr).

73/100

Healthy

Actively maintained with regular releases.

Maintenance 23/40

Releases 25/25

Community 16/20

Momentum 8/15

Commit activity more than 58% of tracked projects; popularity more than 82%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

tubesync

Syncs YouTube channels and playlists to a locally hosted media server.

78/100

Healthy

Actively maintained with regular releases.

Maintenance 27/40

Releases 25/25

Community 11/20

Momentum 15/15

Commit activity more than 67% of tracked projects; popularity more than 56%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

How to read this

Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.

What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.

See every option in this category: self-hosted media management.