Sentry Self-Hosted vs WebHook Tester

Both are self-hosted software development - testing projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.

Sentry Self-Hosted scores 96 against WebHook Tester's 28, putting it clearly ahead on the strength of a higher commit volume and more recent releases. That measures project health, not feature fit — WebHook Tester may still be the right choice if it does what you need.

	Sentry Self-Hosted	WebHook Tester
Health score	96/100	28/100
Commits (11 mo)	17161	47
Commits (last 3 mo)	4931	0
Stars	45k	541
Latest release	15 Sept 2026	13 Apr 2026
Licence	BUSL-1.1	MIT
Built with	Python	Docker, Go, deb, K8S
Typical RAM	2 GB	1 GB

Sentry Self-Hosted

Powerful error tracking platform with wide language support and a robust API.

96/100

Thriving

High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.

Maintenance 40/40

Releases 25/25

Community 19/20

Momentum 12/15

Commit activity in the top 1% of tracked projects; popularity more than 96%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

WebHook Tester

Powerful tool for testing WebHooks and more.

28/100

At risk

Little to no recent activity. Treat as unmaintained until proven otherwise.

Maintenance 7/40

Releases 16/25

Community 5/20

Momentum 0/15

Commit activity more than 18% of tracked projects; popularity more than 24%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

How to read this

Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.

What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.

See every option in this category: self-hosted software development - testing.