Statistics for Strava vs wger
Both are self-hosted health and fitness projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Statistics for Strava | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 58/100 | 85/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 1076 | 1250 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 1 | 436 |
| Stars | 9 | 7k |
| Latest release | 19 Jul 2026 | 3 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Built with | Docker | Python, Docker |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Statistics for Strava
Statistics dashboard generated from Strava data.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 80% of tracked projects; popularity in the bottom 1%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
wger
Web-based personal workout, fitness and weight logger/tracker. It can also be used as a simple gym management utility and offers a full REST API as well.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 83% of tracked projects; popularity more than 73%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted health and fitness.