Super Productivity vs Wekan
Both are self-hosted task management & to-do lists projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Super Productivity | Wekan | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 89/100 | 97/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 3335 | 8851 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 1224 | 6892 |
| Stars | 22k | 21k |
| Latest release | 19 Sept 2026 | 27 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Built with | Docker | Nodejs |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Super Productivity
Advanced todo list app with integrated timeboxing and time tracking capabilities. Integrates with Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Redmine and OpenProject.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 94% of tracked projects; popularity more than 89%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
Wekan
Trello-like kanban.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity in the top 1% of tracked projects; popularity more than 88%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted task management & to-do lists.