Surmai vs TRIP

Both are self-hosted travel organization projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.

TRIP scores 68 against Surmai's 47, putting it clearly ahead on the strength of a higher commit volume and a larger community. That measures project health, not feature fit — Surmai may still be the right choice if it does what you need.

	Surmai	TRIP
Health score	47/100	68/100
Commits (11 mo)	21	520
Commits (last 3 mo)	13	60
Stars	282	1.9k
Latest release	19 Sept 2026	27 Sept 2026
Licence	MIT	MIT
Built with	Docker	Docker
Typical RAM	1 GB	1 GB

Surmai

Collaborative personal and family travel organizer.

47/100

Slowing

Activity has dropped noticeably. Check the repository before committing to it.

Maintenance 4/40

Releases 25/25

Community 3/20

Momentum 15/15

Commit activity more than 11% of tracked projects; popularity more than 15%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

TRIP

Minimalist POI Map tracker and Trip planner.

68/100

Healthy

Actively maintained with regular releases.

Maintenance 26/40

Releases 25/25

Community 10/20

Momentum 8/15

Commit activity more than 65% of tracked projects; popularity more than 48%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

How to read this

Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.

What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.

See every option in this category: self-hosted travel organization.