Actual vs HyperSwitch
Both are self-hosted money, budgeting & management projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Actual | HyperSwitch | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 85/100 | 95/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 1398 | 2054 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 342 | 620 |
| Stars | 29k | 45k |
| Latest release | 1 Sept 2026 | 24 Aug 2026 |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Built with | Nodejs, Docker | Docker, Rust |
| Typical RAM | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Actual
Local-first personal finance tool based on zero-sum budgeting, supporting synchronization across devices, custom rules, manual transaction importing (from QIF, OFX, and QFX files), and optional automatic synchronization with many banks.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 85% of tracked projects; popularity more than 91%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
HyperSwitch
Payment switch to make payments fast, reliable and affordable. Connect with multiple payment processors and route traffic effortlessly, all with a single API integration.
High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.
Commit activity more than 90% of tracked projects; popularity more than 96%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted money, budgeting & management.