Bugsink vs Erxes

Both are self-hosted ticketing projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.

Erxes scores 86 against Bugsink's 78, putting it slightly ahead on the strength of a higher commit volume. That measures project health, not feature fit — Bugsink may still be the right choice if it does what you need.

	Bugsink	Erxes
Health score	78/100	86/100
Commits (11 mo)	661	2383
Commits (last 3 mo)	267	876
Stars	2.1k	4.1k
Latest release	25 Sept 2026	24 Sept 2026
Licence	⊘ Proprietary	AGPL-3.0, Commons-Clause
Built with	Python, Docker	Docker, Nodejs
Typical RAM	1 GB	1 GB

Bugsink

Real-time error tracking for your applications with all the details in one place. Easy setup with clear instructions included.

78/100

Healthy

Actively maintained with regular releases.

Maintenance 28/40

Releases 25/25

Community 10/20

Momentum 15/15

Commit activity more than 71% of tracked projects; popularity more than 50%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

Erxes

Marketing, sales, and customer service platform designed to help businesses attract more engaged customers.

86/100

Thriving

High commit volume, frequent releases and growing activity.

Maintenance 37/40

Releases 25/25

Community 13/20

Momentum 12/15

Commit activity more than 92% of tracked projects; popularity more than 63%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

How to read this

Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.

What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.

See every option in this category: self-hosted ticketing.