Hi.Events vs Seatsurfing

Both are self-hosted booking and scheduling projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.

Hi.Events scores 73 against Seatsurfing's 68, putting it slightly ahead on the strength of a stronger recent trend and a larger community. That measures project health, not feature fit — Seatsurfing may still be the right choice if it does what you need.

	Hi.Events	Seatsurfing
Health score	73/100	68/100
Commits (11 mo)	288	1063
Commits (last 3 mo)	73	300
Stars	4k	316
Latest release	27 Aug 2026	27 Sept 2026
Licence	AGPL-3.0	GPL-3.0
Built with	Docker	Docker
Typical RAM	1 GB	1 GB

Hi.Events

Event management and ticketing platform for conferences, concerts, and more. Offering customizable event pages and embeddable ticket widgets.

73/100

Healthy

Actively maintained with regular releases.

Maintenance 21/40

Releases 25/25

Community 13/20

Momentum 15/15

Commit activity more than 51% of tracked projects; popularity more than 63%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

Seatsurfing

Webbased app to book seats, desks and rooms for offices.

68/100

Healthy

Actively maintained with regular releases.

Maintenance 32/40

Releases 25/25

Community 3/20

Momentum 8/15

Commit activity more than 80% of tracked projects; popularity more than 17%. How this is calculated.

Commits, last 11 months

How to read this

Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.

What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.

See every option in this category: self-hosted booking and scheduling.