QloApps vs Seatsurfing
Both are self-hosted booking and scheduling projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| QloApps | Seatsurfing | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 67/100 | 68/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 778 | 1063 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 445 | 300 |
| Stars | 14k | 316 |
| Latest release | 4 Jul 2025 | 27 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | OSL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Built with | PHP, Nodejs | Docker |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
QloApps
Customizable and intuitive web-based hotel reservation system and a booking engine.
Maintained, but at a slower pace than the leaders in its category.
Commit activity more than 75% of tracked projects; popularity more than 84%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
Seatsurfing
Webbased app to book seats, desks and rooms for offices.
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 80% of tracked projects; popularity more than 17%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted booking and scheduling.