Bugsink vs ITFlow
Both are self-hosted ticketing projects. This page compares how well each one is actually maintained — the part you cannot see from a feature list.
| Bugsink | ITFlow | |
|---|---|---|
| Health score | 78/100 | 79/100 |
| Commits (11 mo) | 661 | 1052 |
| Commits (last 3 mo) | 267 | 444 |
| Stars | 2.1k | 1k |
| Latest release | 25 Sept 2026 | 1 Sept 2026 |
| Licence | ⊘ Proprietary | GPL-3.0 |
| Built with | Python, Docker | PHP |
| Typical RAM | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bugsink
Real-time error tracking for your applications with all the details in one place. Easy setup with clear instructions included.
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 71% of tracked projects; popularity more than 50%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
ITFlow
Client IT documentation, ticketing, invoicing and accounting for MSPs (Managed Service Providers).
Actively maintained with regular releases.
Commit activity more than 80% of tracked projects; popularity more than 35%. How this is calculated.
Commits, last 11 months
How to read this
Everything above is measured, not opinion: commit counts and release dates come from the public repositories, and the health score ranks each project against all 1352 projects we track. Read the full method.
What this comparison deliberately does not do is tell you which has the better feature set. Maintenance health tells you which project will still be receiving security fixes in two years. Decide that first, then compare features on the projects that survive the filter.
See every option in this category: self-hosted ticketing.